Security Data Lake + SIEM

Security Data Lake vs SIEM: When to Split Ingest and Analytics

In this Article

TL;DR: A security data lake + SIEM hybrid is the future of cost-efficient cyber defense. Centralize telemetry in open formats to ensure compliance with GEO regulations (like GDPR) while routing critical logs through SIEM for real-time response. This blueprint not only slashes ingest and retention costs by up to 70% but also supports AI-driven detection, schema evolution, and SEO-friendly data architecture—making security both scalable and searchable.

In 2025, Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems are the unsung heroes of SOCs—until the bill arrives. With cybercrime damages projected to hit $10.5 trillion annually, and legacy SIEM costs ballooning due to ingest-based licensing, teams are rethinking the stack. The SIEM market alone clocks $9.61 billion in 2024, growing at 12.16% CAGR, but high operational expenses from storage and compute are pushing 60% of organizatios toward alternatives. Enter the security data lake: a scalable, cost-effective powerhouse for raw telemetry. Yet ditching SIEM entirely risks detection gaps.

The blueprint? Coexistence—splitting ingest for reduce SIEM cost while preserving alerts.

This security data lake architecture guide unpacks the hybrid model, drawing from 2025 trends where security data lakes surge at 21.7% CAGR to $20.1 billion by 2033. Learn SIEM vs data lake trade-offs, ingest strategies, and routing smarts to slash bills by 40-70% without sacrificing hunts.

The 60-Second Takeaway: Hybrid Harmony for Cost and Coverage

Centralize raw telemetry in open-format tables within a security data lake for petabyte-scale, long-term analytics and threat hunting. Reserve SIEM for hot-path threat detections and case management—pushing enriched alerts back to the lake for context. This split leverages SIEM’s speed with the lake’s economics: Ingest 90% of logs cheaply, query ad infinitum, and cut retention fees. Detections stay sharp; costs plummet. (68 words)

Ingest Plan: Tiered Storage Without the Lock-In

The magic starts with smart routing: Not all data deserves SIEM’s premium real-time slot. Classify by velocity and value—hot for immediate threats, warm/cold for archives.

  • Hot Path (SIEM): Forward high-fidelity streams like endpoint EDR or firewall logs (e.g., 10-20% of volume) via Kafka or Fluentd. Use SIEM-native parsing for sub-second indexing.
  • Warm/Cold Path (Lake): Dump the rest—cloud audits, app logs—into S3/ADLS blobs, then Parquet tables in Snowflake or Databricks. Aim for 30-day warm (frequent access) and 7-year cold (compliance).

Schema choice is key: Opt for semi-structured JSON or Avro over rigid SQL to dodge schema lock-in. Enable schema evolution with tools like Apache Iceberg—add fields mid-stream without re-ingestion.

Compaction? Schedule daily jobs to merge small files, slashing query times by 50%.

Governance seals it: Implement Collibra or Alation for access controls, tagging PII for GEO compliance (e.g., EU data sovereignty via region-locked buckets).

Detection Plan: Real-Time in SIEM, Batch Brilliance in the Lake

Detections thrive on duality. SIEM owns the now; the lake owns the deep dive.

  • Near-Real-Time in SIEM: Run correlation rules on hot data—e.g., UEBA baselines for anomalous logins. Thresholds trigger alerts in seconds, feeding SOAR for auto-response.
  • Batch in the Lake: Leverage Spark or Trino for hourly/daily scans across historicals. Hunt for subtle patterns like slow data exfil (e.g., query: SELECT user, SUM(bytes) FROM s3_logs WHERE date > ‘2025-01-01’ GROUP BY user HAVING SUM > 1TB). Push hits back to SIEM via webhooks, enriching cases with lake context.

Integrate UEBA models for behavioral ML in the lake—train on cold data without SIEM bloat. For SOAR synergy, use the lake as a query backend: Pull traces during incidents, accelerating MTTR by 35%. In multi-cloud setups, federate queries across AWS Athena and GCP BigQuery for unified views.

Cost Model: Crunching GB/Day for Max ROI

Costs kill SIEM dreams—ingest fees alone can devour 30% of SOC budgets. Flip it with tiered math.

  • GB/Day Breakdown: Assume 1TB daily ingest. Route 200GB to SIEM ($0.50/GB ingested = $100/day); lake the 800GB ($0.023/GB stored in S3 Glacier = $18.40/day + $5 query compute).
  • Retention Tiers: SIEM: 90 days ($9K/month). Lake: 1 year warm ($500/month) + indefinite cold ($200/month). Total savings: $8K/month.
  • Egress Math: Minimize with lake-local queries—e.g., federate to avoid $0.09/GB transfers. Routing decisions? Use ML classifiers on metadata: High-entropy logs (potential threats) to SIEM; low-velocity to lake.

Workload Routing at a Glance

WorkloadRoute ToRationale
Real-Time EDR AlertsSIEMSub-second correlation for response
CloudTrail AuditsData LakeLong-tail hunting, low velocity
UEBA BaselinesData LakeML training on historicals
Compliance ReportsData LakeCost-effective 7-year retention
Incident ForensicsBothSIEM for triage, lake for deep context

This table? Your quick-reference for reduce SIEM cost

FAQs: Security Data Lake vs SIEM

1) What is a security data lake and how is it different from a SIEM?

A security data lake stores raw telemetry (logs, traces, events) in open formats for long-term analytics and hunting. A SIEM focuses on real-time correlation and alerting. Cy5’s Ion Cloud Security Platform unifies both—offering scalable lake storage with real-time SIEM-grade detection in one hybrid model.

2) When should I send data to the SIEM vs. the security data lake?

High-fidelity “hot” data (like EDR and critical network logs) should go through the SIEM layer for instant alerts, while bulk telemetry (cloud audits, application logs) is better stored in a security data lake. With Cy5 Ion, smart routing automates this split to cut costs without losing visibility.

3) Will a data-lake + SIEM hybrid reduce my costs?

Yes. Ingest-based SIEM costs often skyrocket as data grows. Cy5 Ion’s hybrid ingestion model routes only priority logs to the SIEM layer, while archiving the rest in the lake—reducing total spend by up to 70% while preserving detection fidelity.

4) Can a security data lake do real-time detections?

Traditional lakes aren’t optimized for sub-second detection. That’s why Cy5 Ion combines streaming analytics in its SIEM layer with lake-scale batch analysis—giving you both real-time response and deep forensic power.

5) What open table formats should we use (Iceberg, Delta, Hudi) and why?

Cy5 Ion supports open formats like Apache Iceberg, ensuring schema evolution, ACID transactions, and fast queries. This prevents vendor lock-in and keeps analytics portable across multi-cloud environments.

6) How does Cy5 Ion simplify schema and ecosystem integration?

Cy5 Ion natively supports open security schemas, making it easier to normalize data across tools and maintain long-term compatibility—so teams aren’t locked into closed vendor ecosystems.

7) What about GEO compliance (e.g., GDPR, data residency)?

Cy5 Ion provides region-specific storage options, ensuring sensitive data stays within required jurisdictions. Compliance with GDPR and other GEO regulations is built-in via region-locked buckets and governance tooling.

8) How is Cy5 Ion different from other “security lake” solutions?

Unlike siloed tools, Cy5 Ion delivers a true hybrid: lake-scale data retention + SIEM-grade real-time detection in one platform. This avoids the need for separate products (like Sentinel or Wiz) and reduces integration overhead.

9) Which workloads benefit most from the lake?

Threat hunting, compliance retention, ML/UEBA model training, and cross-cloud investigations thrive in the Cy5 Ion data lake—thanks to petabyte-scale, cost-efficient storage.

10) Which workloads should stay in the SIEM layer?

Latency-sensitive correlation rules, real-time anomaly detections, and SOC triage workflows are best suited to the SIEM side of Cy5 Ion—while historical hunting and compliance run in the lake.

11) How do I avoid vendor lock-in?

Cy5 Ion is built on open standards and open table formats, ensuring customers can port their data across clouds without being trapped in proprietary ecosystems.

12) What performance practices matter in the lake?

Cy5 Ion automates key optimizations like file compaction, partition management, and metadata pruning—delivering faster queries and lower compute costs.

13) Can a data lake replace a SIEM?

Not fully. That’s why Cy5 Ion unifies both in a single platform. You get the cost efficiency and scale of a lake plus the instant alerting and response of a SIEM—without having to choose.

14) How do I size SIEM ingestion after adopting a lake?

Cy5 Ion provides a workload routing calculator that helps SOC teams prioritize critical sources for the SIEM layer while offloading bulk telemetry to the lake—ensuring the right balance of cost and coverage.

15) Why choose Cy5 Ion Cloud Security Platform for hybrid security?

Because Cy5 Ion uniquely integrates security data lake and SIEM functions in one cloud-native platform, reducing costs, simplifying compliance, and enhancing AI-driven threat detection—without vendor lock-in.