SOLUTION / SECURITY DATA LAKE

Enterprise Security Data Lake
for Cloud-Native SOC & Indian Compliance

Cy5 ingests telemetry from any cloud, normalises it in real time, and stores it at the economics of object storage, so your SOC team hunts threats, not storage bills.

Serverless
Real-Time
Compliance-Ready
cy5_security_lake — threat_feed
[00:00:01] CloudTrail ingestion: ACTIVE
[00:00:02] VPC Flow Logs: NORMALISED
[00:00:04] IAM anomaly detected: LATERAL_MOVE
[00:00:05] Alert correlated — noise suppressed
[00:00:06] CERT-In report: AUTO-GENERATED
97% MTTD Reduction
<24h Time to First Value
180-Day Log Retention
100% CERT-In Retention
The Problem, Precisely Stated

What Actually Breaks When
Security Logging Scales

The failure is not one of awareness. CISOs understand the threat landscape. The failure is architectural, security data lives in the wrong place, at the wrong cost, with the wrong access patterns.

01 / Architectural Failure

Telemetry Accumulates Faster Than You Can Act On It

Cloud infrastructure generates events that outpace ingestion budgets. Teams filter aggressively at the source, discarding telemetry that's critical during an investigation months later.

Data loss at ingestion
02 / Detection Gap

1–24 Hour Detection Window Is Your Attacker's Advantage

Scheduled polling creates a structural blind spot. Attackers pivot from initial access to exfiltration in under 10 minutes. Your SIEM finds out an hour later, if the log wasn't filtered first.

Polling latency risk
03 / Retention Crisis

30-Day Retention Can't Answer a 6-Month Audit

Commercial SIEM limits cap retention at 30–60 days. CERT-In mandates 180. When a regulatory inquiry demands historical trail data, the gap isn't a technical problem, it's a compliance liability.

Compliance exposure

This is not a storage management problem. It is a detection capability problem wearing a cost problem's clothes, and conventional SIEM architectures were never designed for the multi-cloud, compliance-heavy realities of Indian enterprises.

Cy5 Diagnostic · Cloud-Native SOC Readiness
Structural Mismatch

Why Conventional Approaches Fall Short

RAW SECURITY DATAsource
SIEM ENGINEoutput — degraded
first crack
major rupture
noise
signal lost
enrichment missing
context gap
More pipe doesn't fix a broken pipeline — fix the source first.

Most enterprise security teams assume more SIEM solves a detection problem, it doesn't. A SIEM is an analytics engine, and its output is only as good as the data feeding it.

Cy5 inverts that logic: fix the data first, and detection compounds automatically. Security telemetry is written once and queried rarely, for alerting, investigation, and threat hunting See how graph-driven threat hunting reveals hidden cloud attack paths, lateral movement, and toxic IAM chains traditional CSPM tools miss. yet it's stored in expensive hot-storage architectures designed for high-frequency transactions. Object storage with serverless query engines is the economically correct architecture for this access pattern.

Cy5 applies that principle operationally, with the security-specific enrichment and correlation logic a generic data lake doesn't provide.

Legacy SIEM
Data Collection
Approved connectors only. Custom sources need pro services. Filtering at ingestion to control cost.
Storage Economics
Hot storage per GB or EPS license. Retention capped by commercial constraints, not operational need.
MAX
Detection Architecture
1–24h polling windows. Single-source rules produce high noise and analyst fatigue.
Alert Quality
10:1 signal-to-noise accepted as norm. Manual triage. Analysts dismiss instead of investigate.
VS
Cy5 Approach
Vendor-Agnostic Ingestion
Any source, no approval list. CloudTrail, Azure Monitor, GCP, on-prem syslog. Full-fidelity, zero filtering.
Serverless Object Storage
Storage cost decoupled from analytics. 180-day retention viable at scale. Encrypted, versioned, protected.
Event-Driven Architecture
Zero polling. Real-time detection triggers. Cross-layer correlation, cloud, identity, network, workload.
96% Noise Reduction
Contextual enrichment before analyst review. Every alert carries cloud context, identity state, permission scope.
The India-Specific Dimension
CERT-In · Apr 2022
Cybersecurity Platform

180-Day Retention. 6-Hour Incident Reporting.

ICT infrastructure operators must retain logs for 180 days and report qualifying incidents within six hours. Most SIEM environments don't meet either requirement simultaneously.

Dive Deeper
Read a blog on New CERT-In Guidelines
RBI · Cybersecurity Framework
Cybersecurity Platform

Audit-Ready Log Management for Regulated Entities

RBI requires log management aligned to ISO 27001 with periodic audit readiness. For BFSI and NBFCs, coverage gaps aren't inconveniences — they're regulatory liabilities.

Dive Deeper
Read a blog on DPDP Rules
DPDP Act · 2025
Cybersecurity Platform

Data Localisation Affects Where Telemetry Lives

The DPDP Act introduces localisation requirements that affect where security telemetry can be stored. Global SIEM vendors were not built with this constraint in mind.

Dive Deeper
Read a blog on DPDP Act 2025
The Solution / How It Works

One Platform. Every Signal.
Zero Blind Spots.

Cy5's Security Data Lake is a cloud-native, serverless platform that ingests security telemetry from any source, enriches it through contextual correlation, and stores it at object storage economics — with full query capability. No scheduled polling. No detection windows. Event-driven from source to signal.

Data Sources
AWS CloudTrail
Azure Monitor
GCP Audit Logs
On-Prem Syslog
SaaS / M365
Cy5 Engine Correlate · Enrich
Detect · Store
Actionable Output
Refined Alerts → SOC
Compliance Reports
Threat Hunt Queries
01 Ingest
02 Normalise
03 Correlate
04 Detect
05 Act
Capability Pillars

Six Pillars. One Unified Security Posture.

Each capability is purpose-built to close a specific gap in cloud-native security, and they compound when deployed together.

Pillar 01

Serverless Security Data Lake

Object storage-backed lake with encryption at rest, delete protection, versioning, and distributed redundancy. Queryable via standard SQL, no proprietary query languages.

12-month retention for CERT-In compliance costs a fraction of equivalent SIEM hot storage. Historical data available for threat hunting without egress cost surprises.

CISOs · Compliance Leads
Pillar 02

Hybrid Ingestion Pipeline

Vendor-agnostic collection from cloud-native sources, on-prem infrastructure, identity providers, SaaS platforms, and custom resources. Quick onboarding without lengthy integration projects.

Eliminates coverage gaps from connector-limited architectures. Every security-relevant telemetry source contributes to the detection surface.

Cloud Architects · DevSecOps
Pillar 03

Contextual Correlation Engine

Parses, enriches, and applies behaviour analysis to detect toxic combinations across cloud, identity, network, and workload layers, not single-source rule hits.

A misconfigured EC2 + public access + full IAM is only detectable when all three sources are correlated in the same analytical context.

SOC Leaders · Security Architects
Pillar 04
IAM

Identity Risk Analysis

Compares granted permissions vs. permissions actually exercised. Surfaces access keys without MFA, over-provisioned accounts, and service accounts with dangerous create permissions.

Most privilege escalation paths begin with an identity that appears legitimate but carries disproportionate access relative to its operational need.

CISOs · IAM Owners
Pillar 05
5%

Vulnerability Monitoring with Cloud Context

Maps CVEs against compute context — public exposure, network reachability, active exploitation. Filters 100% critical/high down to ~5% that are genuinely exploitable.

An organisation that can't distinguish a critical CVE on a public API from the same CVE on an internal batch processor can't prioritise remediation.

DevSecOps · Platform Teams
Pillar 06

Kubernetes Security Posture Monitoring

Read-only scanner pod monitors container privilege escalation, insecure API exposure, permissive RBAC, CoreDNS risks. Metadata enriched in the Cy5 Control Plane.

K8s security degradation is incremental, permissions added without review, baseline images not updated. Continuous posture monitoring surfaces drift before exploitation.

Platform Engineers · DevOps
Architecture & Integration

Serverless architecture; no cluster management, no capacity planning. SQL-compatible query interface integrates with Zeppelin, EMR, Athena for threat hunting. JSON-structured alert output feeds existing SOAR platforms and ticketing systems without transformation. For organisations with existing SIEM investments, Cy5 functions as the long-term retention and analytics layer, reducing SIEM ingestion costs significantly.

India-Contextualized Use Cases

How Indian Enterprises Actually Deploy Cy5

Illustrative composites from production deployments across fintech, telecom, and GCC sectors, with verified outcome metrics.

Fintech · Payments · Mumbai
Series B AWS + On-Prem RBI Regulated

CERT-In Compliance & Real-Time Detection for a Payments Platform

30-DAY CAP Cy5 180-DAY · SEALED
Problem
  • CloudTrail capped at 30 days — Splunk cost ceiling
  • RBI audit exposed 6-month retention gap
  • Zero cross-system log correlation
Cy5 Approach
  • Serverless data lake — CloudTrail + VPC + syslog
  • Event-driven ingestion, 180-day encrypted retention
  • IAM anomaly correlation rules activated
Outcome
  • CERT-In + RBI aligned within 24 hours
  • 85% alert noise eliminated
  • Full cloud context on every remaining alert
<24h
Onboarding
Cloud-native deploy
85%
Noise Reduced
Before analyst review
180d
Retention
At object storage cost
Illustrative composite · Fintech sector
Read Full Case Study
Fintech · CERT-In · RBI

How a Series B payments platform achieved 180-day retention and 85% noise reduction — deployed in under 24 hours.

Telecom · Managed SOC · Pan-India
Multi-Vendor NW AWS 200+ Alerts/Day

Reducing MTTD from 18 Hours to Minutes for a Managed SOC

200+ DAILY ALERTS 18h MTTD · BACKLOG CORRELATE ACTIONABLE SIGNALS MINUTES · CLEAR
Problem
  • MTTD averaging 18 hours — alert backlog
  • Analysts drowning in false positive triage
  • Compliance reports: manual, two systems
Cy5 Approach
  • Syslog + cloud + identity consolidated
  • Multi-source correlation suppressed noise
  • Automated compliance from unified store
Outcome
  • MTTD reduced by 97% — hours to minutes
  • 3 person-months/year recovered
  • Duplicate log tool eliminated
97%
MTTD Reduction
Hours → Minutes
3 mo
Analyst Time / Yr
Recovered from triage
↓ TCO
Tooling Consolidation
Duplicate tool removed
Illustrative composite · Telecom sector
Read Full Case Study
Telecom · Managed SOC

How a managed SOC cut MTTD by 97% and recovered 3 person-months/year from manual alert triage.

GCC · Financial Services · Hyderabad
US Parent AWS + Azure SOC 2 · ISO 27001

Multi-Cloud Visibility for a US Financial Services Delivery Centre

AWS AZURE UNIFY ! UNIFIED · CORRELATED
Problem
  • No unified AWS + Azure visibility
  • Misconfigurations accumulating unchecked
  • ISO 27001 audit prep: 2 weeks manual
Cy5 Approach
  • Dual-cloud deploy + KSPM enabled
  • Misconfig correlation — findings in 72 hours
  • Compliance automation configured
Outcome
  • 96% noise reduced — real threats only
  • Parent entity audit satisfied automatically
  • CISO visibility, zero headcount added
96%
Noise Reduced
Multi-cloud correlation
72h
First Findings
Impactful misconfigs found
0
Headcount Added
Shared services team
Illustrative composite · GCC sector
Read Full Case Study
GCC · Multi-Cloud · ISO 27001

How a Hyderabad delivery centre gained unified AWS + Azure visibility and 96% noise reductionzero headcount added.

Evaluating This for Your Organisation?

We walk you through a scoped assessment of your current logging and detection architecture, specific to your cloud environment, compliance obligations, and team structure. No generic demos. No sales pressure.

Response within 1 business day NDA available pre-sales No lock-in pilot India-based engineering
Outcomes & Business Impact

What Changes When the Data Layer Is Fixed

Every metric below is drawn from production deployments across fintech, telecom, and GCC sectors, not lab benchmarks.

BEFORE CRITICAL CRITICAL HIGH CRITICAL MEDIUM CRITICAL HIGH SIGNAL BURIED IN NOISE 4,281 WEEKLY NOISE EVENTS DISMISSED AVG RESPONSE 18h 42m CY5 AFTER REAL-TIME DETECTION Verified: IAM lateral movement detected CLOUD + IDENTITY + NETWORK CONTEXT Verified: S3 public exposure + PII risk TOXIC COMBINATION CORRELATED Verified: RBAC overprivilege drift in K8s K8S + IAM POSTURE ENRICHED 180-DAY LAKE ENCRYPTED · VERSIONED · QUERYABLE AVG RESPONSE 4m 12s
97%
MTTD Reduction
Hours → Minutes
96%
Alert Noise Suppressed
Before analyst review
3 mo
Analyst Time / Year
Recovered from triage
<24h
First Value
Cloud-native deploy
Outcome 01

MTTD Reduced by Up to 97%

Event-driven architecture eliminates the detection window created by scheduled polling. Organisations that previously measured MTTD in hours measure it in minutes.

Outcome 02

Alert Noise Reduced by 85–96%

Contextual correlation suppresses events below multi-source risk threshold. Alerts that reach analysts carry cloud context, identity context, and permission state.

Outcome 03

CERT-In & RBI Compliance Without Cost Escalation

180-day retention at object storage economics. Organisations that previously capped at 30–60 days extend to 180+ without proportionate cost increases.

Outcome 04

~ 3 Person-Months Per Year Recovered

Time recovered from manual triage, compliance reporting, and cross-system correlation is returned to threat hunting, rule tuning, and security architecture review.

Outcome 05

Lower TCO Through SIEM Integration

Cy5 operates alongside existing SIEM investments. Long-term retention and historical querying move out of hot storage, SIEM ingestion volumes decrease significantly.

Outcome 06

Toxic Misconfigurations Surfaced Before Exploitation

Public network access + overpermissive compute + full IAM access, risk combinations that individual posture tools miss because they evaluate each dimension in isolation.

Outcome 07

Automated Compliance Report Generation

RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, ISO 27001, SOC 2, manual evidence collection reduced from 2–4 weeks to hours per cycle. Logs retained, queries reproducible, audit trails tamper-evident.

Outcome 08

Detection Scales Without Architectural Rework

New cloud accounts, services, entities, or compliance obligations, the serverless architecture gets more effective as the organisation grows, rather than accumulating technical debt.

Evaluating This for Your Organisation?

We walk you through a scoped assessment of your current logging and detection architecture, specific to your cloud environment, compliance obligations, and team structure.

Request Assessment
No Commitment

No generic demos. No sales pressure. Scoped to your environment, team, and compliance obligations.

Trust, Authority & Proof

Built by Practitioners. Proven in Production.

4 Yrs
Production Deployments
100%
YoY Customer Retention
100%
YoY Revenue Growth
8+
Countries Deployed
Clients Include
Airtel Physics Wallah Aurionpro StashFin Pluang GRIP IND Money
Sectors Served
Fintech 43.8% Telecom IT Enterprise EdTech Energy NBFC & InsureTech
Geographies
India (Primary) United Kingdom Germany Indonesia Uganda UAE
Founder Credential
VM

Vikram Mehta

Founder & CEO, Cy5.io

20 years in offensive & defensive security, fraud management, DevOps, and large-scale platform engineering.
Former CISO at MakeMyTrip Group (2012–2021). Led MMT to DSCI Excellence Awards three times.
IBM consulting with Asia's largest telco clients (2008–2012).
Open source: dataShark (security analytics, Apache Spark) and Blitz (security orchestration, Python).
Featured by ISACA Infosecurity on SOC automation. Speaker at Accel Cybersecurity Summit.
Community & Ecosystem

Vikram contributes to the security practitioner community through GRMI, RootConf, and EC-Council platforms. Cy5 has spoken at Accel's Cybersecurity Summit on serverless detection engineering, recognitions that reflect practitioner credibility rather than marketing programme participation.

Process & Time to Value

From Discovery to Detection in Days, Not Quarters.

A scoped, engineering-led engagement — not a generic POC. Every phase produces a tangible output.

PHASE 01 Discovery 1–2 DAYS Environment map Compliance matrix PHASE 02 Deploy <24 HOURS Live data lake First signals active ★ FIRST VALUE PHASE 03 Tune 5–10 DAYS Tuned ruleset Noise reduction validated PHASE 04 Comply 2–3 DAYS CERT-In 180-day set Audit pipeline live PHASE 05 Operate DAY 15+ Self-sufficient team Detection compounds DAY 0 DAY 1 — FIRST VALUE DAY 10 DAY 13 DAY 15+ ONGOING Engineering-led. Scoped to your environment. Every phase delivers a tangible output.
01

Discovery & Environment Mapping

1–2 Business Days
+

60–90 min structured session. Cloud accounts, log sources, existing tooling, compliance obligations, and team structure mapped. Read-only access, no data egress.

Output: Environment map · Log source inventory · Compliance requirement matrix · Deployment scope
02

Pilot Configuration & Data Lake Deployment

Under 24 Hours
+

Serverless Security Data Lake deployed. No infrastructure provisioning. No agents for cloud-native sources. First detection signals visible within hours.

Output: Live Security Data Lake · Active log ingestion · First actionable security signals
03

Baseline Establishment & Rule Tuning

5–10 Business Days
+

Detection engineers build behavioural baselines against your topology. Alert thresholds calibrated. False positive rate benchmarked against your actual environment.

Output: Tuned detection ruleset · Validated noise reduction · Benchmarked FP rate
04

Compliance Alignment & Reporting

2–3 Business Days
+

Retention policies set for CERT-In 180-day and RBI framework. Automated compliance report templates configured. Audit evidence workflows validated.

Output: Compliant retention posture · Automated regulatory reporting pipeline
05

Handover, Training & Continuous Optimisation

Day 15+ Ongoing
+

SOC team trained on console, triage workflows, threat hunting queries, and data lake access. Ongoing rule updates. Quarterly posture reviews.

Output: Self-sufficient analyst team · Detection capability that compounds over time
Time to Value
24h
First Actionable Signals
< 24h First detection signals live
Week 1 Compliance reporting operational
Day 10–15 Production-grade detection posture

Time-Boxed Pilot · 2–4 Weeks

Deployed against real telemetry with Cy5 engineering resource. Not a self-serve trial.

Outcome-Referenced Pricing

Reflects scope, not seat counts. No ingestion tiers penalising full-fidelity logging.

India-Based Engineering

GST, onshore SLAs, CERT-In familiarity. NDA-first for sensitive pre-sales.

Engagement & Commercial Philosophy

Proof Before Commitment. Economics That Align.

Cy5's engagement model is designed for Indian enterprise procurement realities — scoped pilots, outcome-referenced pricing, and no multi-year lock-in.

The standard engagement begins with a time-boxed pilot — typically 2–4 weeks — deployed in your environment against real cloud telemetry. Cy5 brings engineering resource to configure detection rules against your specific environment. The output is a working deployment with benchmarked noise reduction and validated compliance posture.

Pilot Structure

Scoped, Not Free-Trial

2–4 week time-boxed pilot deployed against real cloud telemetry. Cy5 brings detection engineering resource — this is a scoped engagement, not a self-serve product trial. Both parties validate fit before committing to a full subscription term.

  • Real telemetry, not synthetic data
  • Benchmarked noise reduction output
  • Validated compliance posture
Pricing Philosophy

Outcome-Referenced, Not Seat-Based

Pricing reflects the scope of your cloud environment and compliance obligations — not arbitrary seat counts or ingestion volume tiers that penalise organisations for full-fidelity logging. Serverless architecture passes storage economics back to you.

  • No per-GB ingestion penalties
  • Storage cost decoupled from analytics
  • No multi-year lock-in required
India-First Advantage

Onshore Team, Local Compliance DNA

The Cy5 team is India-based, which has practical implications for procurement timelines, GST compliance, onshore support SLAs, and the regulatory familiarity that matters when a CERT-In incident report needs filing within six hours.

  • GST-compliant invoicing
  • Onshore support SLAs
  • GCC parent approval support

NDA-First

Available for sensitive pre-sales discussions

1-Day Response

Initial response within 1 business day

No Lock-In

Proof-before-commitment for initial pilots

SOC2

Vendor Assessment

Architecture docs + SOC/ISO evidence for parent approvals

Start with a Conversation

We scope the engagement to your environment, team size, and compliance obligations. No generic demos. No sales pressure. Initial engagements proceed without multi-year lock-in — aligning with standard Indian enterprise procurement preference.

Request a Briefing
Confidential

A 30-minute scoped conversation with a Cy5 security architect. Specific to your cloud, compliance, and team.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Security Leaders Ask First

Platform & Architecture
What is a security data lake? +

A centralised, cost-efficient storage and analytics layer purpose-built for security telemetry. Unlike a SIEM which couples storage with real-time analytics at high cost, a security data lake separates storage from analytics — allowing full-fidelity retention at object storage economics while querying with SQL-compatible engines for threat hunting, investigation, and compliance reporting.

How is a security data lake different from a SIEM? +

A SIEM is an analytics engine with embedded storage — useful for real-time alerting but expensive for long-term retention. A security data lake handles full-fidelity long-term storage and historical analytics; the SIEM consumes pre-correlated, enriched alerts. They're complementary. Cy5 integrates both, so you get SIEM-quality alerting without SIEM-tier storage costs.

Does Cy5 replace my existing SIEM? +

Not necessarily. Cy5 can operate alongside your SIEM, supplying it with enriched, pre-correlated event streams rather than raw logs — reducing ingestion volume and cost while adding long-term retention and threat hunting capability. Where you're re-evaluating your SIEM investment, Cy5's integrated SIEM engine can serve as the replacement.

What data sources does Cy5 ingest? +

Cloud-native (AWS CloudTrail, VPC Flow Logs, Azure Monitor, GCP Audit Logs, Azure AD), on-premises (Cisco, NGINX, Apache syslog), Microsoft 365 audit trails, container and Kubernetes logs, identity provider logs, and custom application telemetry via API. The ingestion pipeline is vendor-agnostic — no pre-approved connector list required.

How does Cy5 compare to AWS Security Lake or native cloud tools? +

AWS Security Lake, Azure Sentinel, and GCP SCC provide strong within-cloud visibility but create coverage gaps at cloud boundaries. Cy5 is cloud-agnostic — it correlates telemetry across AWS, Azure, GCP, and on-premises sources in a single analytical context. The correlation engine identifies cross-cloud risk combinations that single-cloud tools structurally cannot detect.

Detection & Alert Quality
How does Cy5 reduce alert noise without missing genuine threats? +

The contextual correlation engine enriches events with cloud context (network exposure, permission state, resource criticality) and identity context (permissions in use vs. granted, MFA status) before generating alerts. This multi-dimensional enrichment suppresses events lacking risk context while surfacing genuine combinations. 85–96% noise reduction achieved in production without increasing false negative rates.

How does the vulnerability monitoring work? +

Cy5 cross-references CVE data against container images, then maps vulnerabilities against cloud and network context — specifically whether the workload is publicly reachable, network-accessible, and actively running. This reduces the actionable set from 100% of critical/high CVEs to approximately 5% that are exploitable in your specific topology.

What does the KSPM capability cover? +

Read-only access via scanner pod identifies containers allowing command execution, API server insecure ports, overly permissive RBAC roles, containers with root privileges, missing network policies, and CoreDNS modification privileges. Findings are enriched with use-case context and displayed with remediation guidance.

Compliance & Deployment
How does Cy5 meet CERT-In's 180-day log retention requirement? +

Telemetry stored in object storage with encryption, versioning, and delete protection — retaining logs for 180 days or longer as configured. Retention policy enforced automatically at deployment. The serverless architecture makes 180-day retention viable without the cost escalation of equivalent SIEM retention. Automated compliance reports confirm coverage for audit.

What Indian regulatory frameworks does Cy5 support? +

CERT-In log retention and incident reporting directives, RBI cybersecurity framework for regulated entities, SEBI cybersecurity framework, and DPDP Act data localisation considerations. ISO 27001 audit readiness and SOC 2 evidence collection supported through automated reporting. The Cy5 team is India-based and familiar with these practical compliance workflows.

How quickly can Cy5 be deployed? +

For AWS, Azure, or GCP environments, deployment and initial log ingestion complete in under 24 hours. No infrastructure provisioning required — serverless architecture deploys into your existing cloud account. First actionable signals visible within hours. Full tuning and compliance configuration complete within 10–15 business days.

Is Cy5 suitable for startups or only large enterprises? +

Cy5 serves organisations across the spectrum — from Series B-funded fintech platforms to large telecommunications operators and GCC delivery centres. The serverless, consumption-based architecture means deployment complexity and cost scale with environment scope rather than requiring a minimum infrastructure commitment.

Quick Jump

Question not listed?

Speak directly with a Cy5 security architect about your specific environment and requirements.

Ask Us Directly
Ready to Assess Your Security Data Architecture?

Most deployments deliver first value
within 24 hours.

Cy5's Security Data Lake gives your SOC complete telemetry, your analysts actionable signals, and your compliance team defensible evidence — without SIEM-tier storage economics.

Production-Grade in 10–15 Days · India-Based Engineering
Schedule a Technical Briefing
30-Minute Session

Speak with a Cy5 security architect. Scoped to your cloud, compliance, and team. No generic demos.

Download the Solution Brief
PDF · 12 Pages

Architecture overview, sector case studies, and compliance mapping for CERT-In, RBI, and DPDP Act.

Response within 1 business day
NDA available for pre-sales discussions
No lock-in for initial pilot engagement

Start Evaluating ion Cloud Security Platform

Event-driven protection. Zero blind spots. Infinite scale.